Williams v. Bergin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment. After the work had been completed to the satisfaction of the superintendent of streets, that officer made an assess*169ment therefor May 6, 1892, by which the land described in the complaint was assessed in the sum of six hundred and fourteen dollars and thirty cents. Within thirty days thereafter, viz., May 14th, the contractors to whom the assessment was issued, deeming that they were entitled to receive a larger sum, appealed therefrom, by filing in the office of the clerk of the board of supervisors a notice of their appeal, in which their objections were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Scammon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Mahoney v. BravermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Fry v. BennettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
- People v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stockton Automobile Co. v. ConferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Harris v. Minnesota Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.