Shamp v. White
California Supreme Court
vAppeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Action for unlawful detainer, brought under subdivision 1 of section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The appeal is from the judgment. Exception is taken to the decision on the ground that it is not supported by the evidence. The evidence and the rulings complained of are presented by bill of exceptions.
The complaint averred defendant’s entry under a lease which which was pleaded not in precise words, but by its legal effect. The answer denied the making of the lease pleaded in the complaint, and affirmatively set forth in full the contract between the parties. This was sufficient to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Renoud v. DaskamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Murphy v. Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Gilman v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rogers v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- I. X. L. Furniture & Carpet Installment House v. BeretsUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Gray v. Maier & Zobelein BreweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.