Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action commenced April 4, 1910, to obtain judgment for three hundred and sixty dollars rent alleged to be due under the terms of a lease for the months of January, February, March, and April, 1910. The case was submitted to the trial court for decision upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed and this is an appeal by defendant from such judgment.
The material facts are as follows: On May 17, 1906, plaintiff was the owner of a lot of land forty by sixty feet fronting on Oregon Street near Davis Street in San Francisco. This lot was within the territory in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Swanger v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Sheppard v. RosenkransWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Wayman Investment Co. v. WessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Hinson v. DelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Mutual Paper Co. v. Hoague-Sprague Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Academy Spires, Inc. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.