Legal Opinion

State v. Billstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1967No. 39976PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbery and asserts that the court erred (1) in receiving evidence that defendant committed two other robberies; (2) in permitting a police officer to testify to matters which he discovered through an illegal search and seizure; (3) in denying defendant the right to counsel at the accusatory stage; (4) in receiving tangible evidence which was the product of an illegal search and seizure; (5) in denying defendant’s right against self-incrimination; (6) in failing to require the state to give notice of its intention to show defendant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Whiteman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. People v. McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. James v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. State v. JustMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API