State v. Billstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbery and asserts that the court erred (1) in receiving evidence that defendant committed two other robberies; (2) in permitting a police officer to testify to matters which he discovered through an illegal search and seizure; (3) in denying defendant the right to counsel at the accusatory stage; (4) in receiving tangible evidence which was the product of an illegal search and seizure; (5) in denying defendant’s right against self-incrimination; (6) in failing to require the state to give notice of its intention to show defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Whiteman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- People v. McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- James v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- State v. JustMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.