Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Shevitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This case is instituted by plaintiffs to reform a contract as to the purchase price therein named in regard to the sale and exchange of apartment house properties between the parties. Defendants other than the Shevitzes and Sloans are not interested in the result. Prior to April 8, 1920, plaintiffs were the owners of the equitable title to valuable real estate in the city of Detroit, known as the Palmer apartments, containing 22 apartments and 3 stores. They had purchased this property on a land contract from one Albert E. and Fannye Bernstein. On the above date plaintiffs entered into a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bush v. MerrimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kinyon v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Schlossman v. RouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Labranche v. PerronMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Van Etten v. MANUF. NAT'L BANK OF DETROITMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Alford v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Lane v. NeifertMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Lundberg v. WolbrinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API