Legal Opinion

Labranche v. Perron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1920No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Menominee; Flannigan (Richard C.), J. Bill by Louis Labranche against Menazip Perron' and another for the reformation of a land contract. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Perron appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

There is very little dispute about the facts in this case. The plaintiff has a small store and sawmill in Menominee county. On November 25,1913, two brothers, Celestine and Elginas Boissonneault, approached the plaintiff with the proposition that they go in together and purchase 13 forties of land belonging to one John Gasman. The purchase price was $14,500. The brothers paid to plaintiff $7,000, the advance payment required. Plaintiff saw Gasman and made the purchase, receiving a land contract, which acknowledged the payment of the $7,000 and provided for the payment'of the balance in one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bush v. MerrimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Conlin v. MasecarMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cutler v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Johnson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jensen v. ShevitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Clark v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kelly v. IsraelMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Dolsen v. KearneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API