Legal Opinion

Kinyon v. Cunningham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1906No. Docket No. 65PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Hillsdale; Chester, J. Bill by Daniel B. Kinyon against Isaiah Cunningham and Esther Cunningham to reform a land contract. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Defendant Cunningham was owner and possessed of certain real estate in the city of Hillsdale. Just north of the said premises is a strip of land two rods wide, called and known, as “Warehouse alley,” which strip the bill charges was owned, by the city of Hillsdale. North of the alley is land owned by the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company., adjacent to the tracks of that company. Defendant had a lease of some of the land north of said alley and of the north one-half *431of the alley from the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, the lease containing a covenant that the land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns v. CaskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lyons v. ChafeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API