Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 10, 2006No. SC 17309PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that certain evidence proffered by the defendant was inadmissible under General Statutes § 54-86f, commonly known as the rape shield statute. The state appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the trial court convicting the defendant, Carleton Smith, of three counts of the crime of risk of injury to a child, two counts each of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree as an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. CerretaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. FlemingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.