Legal Opinion

Illig v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 7, 2008No. 2005-5156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The United States moves to summarily affirm the United States Court of Federal Claims’ judgment in Illig v. United States, *88467 Fed.Cl. 47 (2005). Sarah and Gale Illig respond and do not oppose the motion.

Sarah and Gale Illig own land located along a railroad line. On December 28, 1998, they filed a complaint at the Court of Federal Claims, alleging that the conversion of the railroad line into a recreational trail constituted a taking of their interest in a right-of-way requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Illig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API