Illig v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION
DYK, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The United States moves to summarily affirm the United States Court of Federal Claims’ judgment in Illig v. United States, *88467 Fed.Cl. 47 (2005). Sarah and Gale Illig respond and do not oppose the motion.
Sarah and Gale Illig own land located along a railroad line. On December 28, 1998, they filed a complaint at the Court of Federal Claims, alleging that the conversion of the railroad line into a recreational trail constituted a taking of their interest in a right-of-way requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Illig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010