Legal Opinion
Hardy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 13, 2017No. 14-388LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Reconsideration; RCFC 59(a)(1); Notice of Interim Trail Use; Fifth Amendment Taking; Effective Date of Taking; Duration of Taking
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 59(a)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for partial reconsideration of the court’s May 4, 2016 ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (“summary judgment ruling”). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies defendant’s motion for reconsideration.
I. BACKGROUND
In this Rails-to-Trails action, 112 plaintiffs contend that they own real…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Wyatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.