Legal Opinion
Ladd v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 14, 2010No. 2010-5010PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The appellants appeal an order of the Court of Federal Claims granting summary judgment that no compensable taking occurred when the Department of Transportation’s Surface Transportation Board (STB) issued a Notice of Interim Trail Use or Abandonment concerning an easement over the appellants’ land. Because the court’s order conflicts with Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226 (Fed.Cir.2005) and Barclay v. United States, 443 F.3d 1368 (Fed.Cir.2006), we reverse.
Background
The appellants own land in Cochise County, Arizona near the United States-Mexico border. In 1903,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Caquelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Navajo Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Chicago Coating Company, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.