In re C. F. Beckwith & Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. Involuntary proceedings. Hearing on petition; answer, and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBAED, District Judge.
These are involuntary proceeding^, instituted against the firm of C. F. Beckwith & Co., composed, as it is alleged, of Charles F. Beckwith, of Scranton, and Frank CazenoveJones, of New York. Beckwith makes no contest, but Jones answers, denying insolvency and the commission of any act of bankruptcy, and particularly denying that he was a partner as charged.. A jury trial was demanded as to all these issues, but it has been withdrawn as to the question of partnership, which is submitted to the-court for disposition on the proofs.
To maintain the proceedings as to Jones…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gibbs's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- In re KenneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Lott v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- In re ClarkDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. Bates-Street Shirt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- Randall v. GerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- In re KuntzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- McClyman v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- In re PinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.