Legal Opinion

Randall v. Gerrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1916No. 13223PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 12, 1915, in favor of the defendants, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a riveter in bridge construction.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On October 25, 1910, S. J. Randall, while working for Gerrick & Gerrick as a riveter on a steel bridge in course of construction for the Great Northern Railway Company, was injured in his right eye by a chip or sliver of steel which flew from the end of a riveter. He brought suit for damages against the Great Northern Railway Company, and against John Gerrick, Joseph Gerrick, and H. W. Jack, claiming that these individuals constituted the firm of Gerrick & Gerrick, his employers. After the action had been brought, and after a continuance had been had at the instance of the defendants, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Turner v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Haney v. CheathamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. J. E. Pinkham Lumber Co. v. Woodland State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Betcher v. KunzWashington Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API