Legal Opinion
McClyman v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1950No. 12183PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, as creditors of the alleged bankrupts, filed their involuntary petition in bankruptcy to have declared bankrupt appellee Hamilton and the partnership known as Brunson & Bunch. The case is here on appeal from a judgment of the United States district court dismissing the petition as to Hamilton “both as a member of the partnership of Brunson & Bunch [holding he was not a partner] and individually.” •
It is alleged in the petition that Hamilton is a general partner of Brunson & Bunch; that Hamilton and the firm each are insolvent ; that the petitioners’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Podlasky v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Tatum v. Acadian Production CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1940
- Bernards v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufman-Brown Potato Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Aerated Products Co. v. Aeration Processes, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
- In re Pauline's Fashion SalonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954