Legal Opinion

State v. Semrad

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2011No. 25658PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] After sentencing Scott R. Sem-rad to six years in the penitentiary, the circuit court incorrectly informed Semrad that he might be required to serve 35% of his sentence before he would be eligible for parole. 1 After the Department of Correc tions subsequently informed Semrad that he would have to serve 60% of his sentence, he petitioned for habeas corpus relief, which resulted in a stipulated resen-tencing. The circuit court resentenced Semrad to six years in the penitentiary. But this time the court correctly advised Semrad that he might be required to serve 60% of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. SielerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MunkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Roden v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. PuthoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Madetzke v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. State v. WashingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. People v. RojasColorado Court of Appeals · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API