State v. Semrad
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] After sentencing Scott R. Sem-rad to six years in the penitentiary, the circuit court incorrectly informed Semrad that he might be required to serve 35% of his sentence before he would be eligible for parole. 1 After the Department of Correc tions subsequently informed Semrad that he would have to serve 60% of his sentence, he petitioned for habeas corpus relief, which resulted in a stipulated resen-tencing. The circuit court resentenced Semrad to six years in the penitentiary. But this time the court correctly advised Semrad that he might be required to serve 60% of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SielerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MunkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Roden v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PuthoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Madetzke v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- State v. WashingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- People v. RojasColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.