Roden v. Solem
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
Francis Roden appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for ha-beas corpus relief. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Roden was convicted of second degree rape and sentenced to eight years in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. Pursuant to SDCL 24-15-5, the Board of Pardons and Paroles classified Roden as a third-time offender and ruled that he would not be eligible for parole until he had served three-fourths of his eight year sentence. SDCL 24-15-5 states:
A person is eligible for parole, subject to § 24-15-4:(1) If convicted of a felony for the first…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SecrestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Janish v. MurthaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SemradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Boehrns v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Boehrns v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.