Legal Opinion

Roden v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1987No. 15655, 15674PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

Francis Roden appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for ha-beas corpus relief. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Roden was convicted of second degree rape and sentenced to eight years in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. Pursuant to SDCL 24-15-5, the Board of Pardons and Paroles classified Roden as a third-time offender and ruled that he would not be eligible for parole until he had served three-fourths of his eight year sentence. SDCL 24-15-5 states:

A person is eligible for parole, subject to § 24-15-4:(1) If convicted of a felony for the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SecrestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Janish v. MurthaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. SemradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Boehrns v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Boehrns v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API