Legal Opinion

State v. Munk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1990No. 16627PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Robert Munk appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for uttering a no account check. SDCL 22-41-1.2. We affirm.

FACTS

In January of 1989, the state charged Munk with six counts of uttering a no account check in violation of SDCL 22-41-1.2. The parties entered into negotiations and reached a plea agreement which was presented to the trial court. The following discussion about the plea agreement took place at Munk’s arraignment:

THE COURT: Would you like to outline, someone like to outline on the record what the plea negotiation is?

MR. GROFF: I think I can do so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Conway v. HughesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. BucholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ThayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. JoyceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. PuthoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SemradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API