Legal Opinion

Madetzke v. Dooley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2018PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice *352 [¶1.] Paul Madetzke pleaded guilty to second-degree robbery, for which he was sentenced as a habitual offender to imprisonment for 25 years. Madetzke did not appeal his conviction or sentence; instead, he later petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus. The habeas court denied relief, and Madetzke now appeals that decision. He contends that the assistance he received from his trial attorney was ineffective in regard to his decision to plead guilty and in regard to sentencing. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] Madetzke was arrested on suspicion of robbing a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Loop v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Ruffing v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Vanden Hoek v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reay v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Spaniol v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Lacroix v. FlukeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API