Legal Opinion

State v. Boado

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 3, 1999No. 01-98-01091-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*16OPINION

FRANK C. PRICE, Justice (Assigned).

A grand jury indicted appellee, Janice M. Boado, for the felony offense of bribery. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to quash the indictment, and the State appeals. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

A grand jury indicted appellee for bribery. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 36.02 (Vernon 1994). The indictment alleged that appellee “did ... intentionally and knowingly solicit, accept and agree to accept ... a benefit, to-wit: one hundred dollars ($100.00) United States currency, as a consideration for a violation of a duty imposed by law on employees of the Texas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Lee v. MirbahaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. State v. Meadows, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  3. State v. BoadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Kerry Bernard Laurent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  5. Leiroi Mickele Daniels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API