Legal Opinion

Green v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1997No. 1380-95PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

KELLER, Judge.

The trial court convicted appellant of the offense of failure to identify. Texas Penal Code § 38.02. 1 Relying on Ledesma v. State, 677 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), the Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to quash the information. Green v. State, 908 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1995). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether a misdemeanor information charging an offense under § 38.02 must contain an allegation that the accused knew the person…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Ledesma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Ex Parte ElliottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  3. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. State v. Boado, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API