Legal Opinion
State v. Boado
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 19, 2001No. 167-00PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
2Per curiam
Appellee was indicted for bribery. She filed a motion to quash the indictment, which the trial court granted. The State appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed.1
Having examined the record and considered the arguments in the case, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Appellee’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
JOHNSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, J. joined.. State v. Boado, 8 S.W.3d 15, 17-18 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999).
3Cases cited1 opinion
4Cited by13 opinions
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- State v. RhinehartCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. Meadows, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- State v. Kurtz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Kerry Bernard Laurent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.