State v. Edmond
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MANSFIELD, Judge.
On June 1, 1994, appellee, Tony Edmond, was charged by indictment with the offense of official oppression, alleged to have occurred while he was employed as a police officer for the City of Wichita Falls.1 The indictment contained four paragraphs, each alleging an alternative means of committing the offense. The trial court quashed all four paragraphs of the indictment. The State appealed, and the Second Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order as to all four paragraphs. State v. Edmond, 903 S.W.2d 856…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- State v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Trevino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.