Legal Opinion

Candelaria v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 26, 1984No. 62-82CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

In this military pay case, plaintiff seeks a determination that he is entitled to disability retirement pay as a medical disability retiree of the United States Air Force Reserve. In the alternative, plaintiff requests that this Court order defendant to convene a Physical Examination Board to consider whether plaintiff is entitled to receive disability retirement pay as a physical disability retiree of the Air Force Reserve.

Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment and defendant thereafter filed its cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed herein,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles v. Rice, Secretary USAFCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Formanek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Perez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Wright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API