Legal Opinion

Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 12, 1988No. 243-83LPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case comes before this court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and on plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment. In plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, it is claimed that the Army Corps of Engineers’ refusal to issue a fill permit for the development of 12.5 acres of plaintiffs’ wetlands constituted a taking under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment argues that no such taking has occurred. For the reasons set forth below, this court must deny the motions of both parties.…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Bowles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API