Legal Opinion

Wright v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1988No. 520-87CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This action came before the court on defendant’s motion to partially dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state valid claims within the jurisdiction of the court. In its motion defendant contended that plaintiffs’ claims are governed exclusively by 21 U.S.C. § 134a and 9 C.F.R. § 81 and that all other causes of action are without this court’s jurisdiction. Plaintiff responded that both 21 U.S.C. §§ 114a and 134a and their accompanying regulations are applicable. In addition, plaintiffs asserted claims under due process, equal protection and fifth…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Wright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API