Erlenbaugh v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
The petitioners in this case attack their convictions under the Travel Act, 18 U. S. C. § 1952, which makes it unlawful to use a facility of interstate commerce in furtherance of certain criminal activity. Petitioners were tried in five separate trials. The cases were consolidated for purposes of appeal since each raised the question whether causing a publication to be carried by a facility of interstate commerce with an intent to facilitate the operation of a gambling business illegal under state law violated § 1952. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the convictions,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by339 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.