Legal Opinion

Besh v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1943No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 42,040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStare, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of $2,600 for plaintiff, rendered by.the trial court sitting without a jury.

On September 28,1937, defendant company issued to pláintiff its health and accident insurance policy containing the following provisions:

“Part D. Total accident disability benefits for life.
“If such injuries, as described in the insuring clause, do not result in any of the above mentioned specific losses but shall wholly and contivmously disable the insured for one day or more, and so long as the insured lives and sufers said total loss of time, the Association will pay a monthly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  4. Vannett v. Michigan Public Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hazen v. RockefellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Ebert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Firemen's Insurance v. Sterling Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hall v. HorakMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Harker v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API