Legal Opinion

Harker v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

Defendant advances these contentions on this appeal:(1) The fact that plaintiff worked for a period of ten months after the accident at the same job at which he was employed prior to the accident conclusively establishes as a matter of law that his disability was not continuous from the date of accident.(2) The stiff left wrist and substantial loss of grasp in plaintiff's left hand does not qualify him as a person totally disabled within the definition of total disability set forth in the policy.(3) Partial disability and total disability as defined by the policy are mutually exclusive, and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Merrill v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BirdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  5. Joyce v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pinkie A. Brown v. Retirement Committee of the Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, and Briggs & Stratton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Drexler v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Caporali v. Washington National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lewis v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Nichols v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF PITTSBURGHDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API