Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1925No. 15165PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Cherokee county, Okla., on the 23rd day of February, 1923, by D. O. Scott, guardian of Levi Scott Clark, a minor, as plaintiff, against Mary A. Clark and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, defendants. The plaintiff, D. O. Scott, in his petition alleges that he is the qualified and acting guardian of the estate of Levi Scott Clark, a minor, that Mary A. Clark was formerly guardian of the estate of said minor, and that the New Amsterdam Casualty Company is a corporation duly authorized and doing business in the state of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Methvin v. MethvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. American Surety Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Horton v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Cales v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API