Legal Opinion

Methvin v. Methvin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1942No. 30278PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This is an appeal by .Frank B. Methvin, hereinafter referred to as defendant, from an order of the district court of Caddo county sustaining a garnishment and directing application of the garnisheed funds to the payment of a judgment formerly rendered against defendant in favor of Deapolis Methvin, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff.

On January 4, 1924, defendant was appointed and qualified as guardian of the estate of plaintiff, Deapolis Methvin, his minor son. On May 23, 1933, the ward reached his majority and an accounting was had in the county court. As a result of said proceeding the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Bank of Stockham v. Bernhard-WeinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Harjo v. AubreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Annis v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Price v. SanditenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Patmon v. BlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. LittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Lewis v. AubreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API