Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Horton v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1937No. 27104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and rendered judgment for the defendants.

The question here is whether the petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants.

The petition contained allegations that heretofore the defendant, Wilson, appealed to this court from the judgment of the county court of Payne county in a tax ferret proceeding wherein it was ordered that certain of such defendants’ personal property be assessed as omitted property; that such judgment of the county court was superseded by a $250 bond required by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Kirk v. LeemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Venator v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Mapco, Inc. v. MeansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. State Ex Rel. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Kahre v. KahreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API