Legal Opinion

Riordan v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 17, 1974No. 1160-2PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

— The major issue presented in this appeal is one which has not previously been addressed by the appellate courts of this state. We are called upon to interpret an exclusionary clause in an accident-health insurance contract which expressly excepts from coverage any loss occurring or originating while the insured is intoxicated. The question presented is whether such a clause is applicable where the event which produced death or loss is not in any sense causally connected with the intoxication. We affirm the summary judgment of the trial court, determining as a matter of law that such an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Assurance Company of America, a Maryland Corporation v. Wall & Associates LLC of Olympia, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mercer Place Condominium Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API