Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Novak

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1974No. 43028PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This case involves a complaint for declaratory judgment filed by the plaintiff (respondent), Hartford Accident Indemnity Company, against the defendants (appellants), Stanley and Jane Doe Novak, concerning the coverage and rights of the defendants under an “uninsured motorist” portion of an insurance policy with the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from an order by the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

On December 11, 1970, the defendants were involved in an automobile accident with a second vehicle, which struck the defendants’ vehicle as the second vehicle…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Ely v. State Farm Ins.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Detweiler v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API