Legal Opinion

Zinn v. Equitable Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1940No. 28052PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted actions for the purpose of collecting amounts claimed to be due under the double indemnity provision of four life insurance policies insuring Earle W. Zinn. Two actions were brought, one involving three policies of insurance and the other involving one policy. The cases were tried together, although separate judgments were entered in each. They have been consolidated for the purposes of appeal.

After action was begun, Earle W. Zinn, Jr., and Dorothy A. Zinn were made additional defendants, for the reason that they are contingent beneficiaries under each of the policies of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Detweiler v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API