Legal Opinion

Assurance Company of America, a Maryland Corporation v. Wall & Associates LLC of Olympia, a Washington Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2004No. 02-35992PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Wall & Associates (“Wall”) appeals the district court’s grant of Assurance Company of America’s (“Assurance”) motion for summary judgment and the denial of Wall’s cross-motion for summary judgment. In this contract interpretation case, the district court concluded that the policy language for collapse coverage required a “sudden falling down,” which, the court found, Wall did not demonstrate. As there was no collapse and thus no coverage, the district court also deemed all of the collateral issues moot or irrelevant.

The district court erred in interpreting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. General Motors Corporation Leo Burnett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Blaylock v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  5. Andrew ex rel. Pretner v. Century Surety Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API