Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 30, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 4-70026PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEIKENS, Chief Judge.

OPINION AS TO ATTORNEY FEE AWARD

Attorneys for the plaintiff class in this antitrust suit petition for an award of attorney’s fees.

*756 Background'

Although portions of the proceedings have been described elsewhere (Cantor v. Detroit Edison, D.C., 392 F.Supp. 1110; Cantor v. Detroit Edison, 428 U.S. 579, 96 S.Ct. 3110, 49 L.Ed.2d 1141), the history of this case is described in some detail for purposes of this fee petition.

Suit was filed on July 6, 1973. The complaint alleged that defendant through its program of supplying light bulbs to its customers without charge, and of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Plumb v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Knop v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  4. Greenspan v. Automobile Club of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. Purdy v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API