Legal Opinion
Plumb v. State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1990No. 900012PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Appellants Malcolm A. Misuraca, Haley & Stolebarger, Douglas B. Provencher, and Beyers, Costin & Case (collectively “class *736counsel”) seek an award of attorney fees consistent with a stipulation between them and the class they represented in the underlying action. The stipulation was entered after the lower court reduced the amount of fees in accordance with the recommendations of a special master. The court had originally appointed the special master to determine the reasonableness of costs incurred by class counsel. We approve the stipulation in part and remand for an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.