Legal Opinion
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 6, 1976No. 75-122PublishedCited by 382 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*581Mr. Justice Stevens
delivered the opinion of the Court.†
In Parker v. Brown, 317 U. S. 341, the Court held that the Sherman Act was not violated by state action displacing competition in the marketing of raisins. In this case we must decide whether the Parker rationale immunizes private action which has been approved by a State and which must be continued while the state approval remains effective.
The Michigan Public Service Commission pervasively regulates the distribution of electricity within the State and also has given its approval to a marketing practice which has a substantial impact on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by382 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
377 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.