Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES
KANE, District Judge.
In what I now learn is an excessive reverence for practicality I have delayed ruling on the plaintiff’s motion for attorneys fees. By per curiam opinion, the Court of Appeals, ex proprio vigore advises that the judgment in this action is “non final” (sic) and will remain so until I resolve the matter of attorneys fees. The problems with determining attorneys fees in piece-meal fashion are easily describable. I will first determine the reasonable value of attorneys fees for services performed from the inception of the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Ramos v. LammDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Gigot v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.