Fay v. Stubenrauch
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. E. D. Ham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed to plaintiff by defendants, H. & Y. Stubenranch. It was alleged in the complaint that the other defendants, James O’Reilly and one Mrs. M. Quinn, claimed some interest in the mortgaged premises; that the said Mrs. M. Quinn was in possession thereof, cutting and destroying trees, and threatening to continue to do so, and an injunction was prayed, prohibiting her from the commission of Such acts. Summons was issued in said cause, and served on all the de fendants, including Mrs. M. Quinn, and the defaults of all the defendants, including…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reynolds v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Fallon v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In re Estate of SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Chicago Clock Co. v. TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by24 opinions
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Halpern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lauchere v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Boust v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.