Chicago Clock Co. v. Tobin
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
The case alleged by the complaint in this action is in substance that plaintiff, a corporation, agreed to sell certain carpets and other furniture to defendants, they promising to pay for the same the sum of seventeen hundred and twenty-seven dollars in specified monthly installments; defendants received possession of the goods, but agreed that plaintiff should remain the owner thereof until full payment of the price, with the right to retake possession upon default of any of the agreed payments; defendants paid installments amounting to five hundred and thirty-five dollars, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fallon v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fay v. StubenrauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Bradbury Estate Co. v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Morton v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Russ v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968