Boust v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
APPLICATIONS for Writs of Mandamus directed to the Superior Court of Kern County. Paul W. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
These are two petitions for writs of mandamus in cases so similar that we need discuss only one of them, applying our reasoning to both. In ease “S'. F. No. 6087” there is an application for mandate to be directed to the superior court of Kern County for the insertion nunc pro tunc as of September 28, 1911, in the caption and in the body of a certain judgment of the names of a number of defendants, and commanding that an alias writ of restitution issue in accordance with such amended judgment.
The action in which the above mentioned judgment was issued was one in forcible entry and. detainer.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Fay v. StubenrauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Carpenter v. NutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Fallon v. BrittanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Power v. Crown Stage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.