Legal Opinion

Miller v. Horton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1917No. 8166PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, O.

On the 8th day of October, 1014, the defendant in error; Blanche Horton, commenced an action in the district court of Bryan county ag'ainst Norman Miller, plaintiff in error, to recover the sum of $190, alleged to be tlie balance due on a promissory note made by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error. The parties will be -referred to as they appeared in the court below.

The petition of the plaintiff in the court below alleged, in substance: That on the 20th day of September, 1912, the plaintiff and her husband, L. D. Horton, sold to the defendant, Norman Miller,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. . NewbouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Joliet Iron & Steel Co. v. Scioto Fire Brick Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Leggat v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Averill Machinery Co. v. BainMontana Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Traders Bank v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Simansky v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  5. Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API