Miller v. Horton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, O.
On the 8th day of October, 1014, the defendant in error; Blanche Horton, commenced an action in the district court of Bryan county ag'ainst Norman Miller, plaintiff in error, to recover the sum of $190, alleged to be tlie balance due on a promissory note made by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error. The parties will be -referred to as they appeared in the court below.
The petition of the plaintiff in the court below alleged, in substance: That on the 20th day of September, 1912, the plaintiff and her husband, L. D. Horton, sold to the defendant, Norman Miller,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wheeler v. . NewbouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Joliet Iron & Steel Co. v. Scioto Fire Brick Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Leggat v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Averill Machinery Co. v. BainMontana Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Traders Bank v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Simansky v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.