Legal Opinion
Wolfenbarger v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1985No. 83-2331PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Margaret Wolfenbarger brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against the City of Lawton, City police officers Clancy Williams and Loy Bean, Chief of Police Robert Gillian, Comanche County District Attorney Dick Tannery, and Comanche County Assistant District…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Workman v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Crowder v. SinyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Argento v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.