Legal Opinion

Havens v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2015No. 14-1118UnpublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

1 Plaintiff Darrell Havens pleaded guilty in Colorado state court to attempted assault of Detective William Johnson. He then brought suit in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Johnson used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court granted Johnson’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that Havens failed to establish a prima facie case of excessive force and that Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm on the alternative ground that Havens’s claim is…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Estate of Marvin L. Booker v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Ballard v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Joseph Curry v. Brianne YacheraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Hooks v. AtokiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Surat v. KlamserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. Davis v. CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Cabot v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API