South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
This appeal involves the application of offensive collateral estoppel to prevent the litigation of an issue which has been previously decided in another judicial proceeding. We find that the use of collateral estoppel was appropriate in this case and therefore affirm the trial court.
The underlying dispute in this case involves the payment of workers’ compensation benefits by the South Carolina Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (Guaranty) on behalf of the insolvent insurer for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. A recitation of the factual background is necessary for an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Labouseur v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Palm v. General Painting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
3Cited by26 opinions
- Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Zurcher v. BiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Pye v. AycockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- State v. BacoteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.