Shepherd v. State, Department of Fish & Game
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Chief Justice.
This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of AS 16.05.255(d), which states that regulations adopted by the Alaska Board of Game (the Board) “must provide that ... the taking of moose, deer, elk, and caribou by residents for personal or family consumption has preference over taking by nonresidents.” Pursuant to this statute, the Board adopted regulations restricting the hunting of moose by nonresidents in certain game management units. Two Alaska resident big game guides challenged the constitutionality of AS 16.05.255(d) and its related regulations…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Lauth v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.