Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1960No. Civ. 18992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review and annulment of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of compensation benefits from the Subsequent Injuries Fund to the injured employee, Charles Ferguson.
Question Presented
Where the employer has furnished medical treatment to an employee after five years from the employee’s subsequent injury, does the limitation in section 5410, Labor Code, or that in section 5405, subdivision (e), apply to an application for benefits from the Subsequent Injuries Fund?
Record
Ferguson sustained an industrial injury to his back on May 7, 1957. Prior thereto, he had a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- State, Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grant v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Sanchez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State of California v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Youngblood v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.