Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commision

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1944No. Civ. No. 12738PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The petitioner as the insurance carrier of a general employer seeks to review an award of the respondent commission based upon a holding that the general and the special employers were both liable for payment of compensation. Both being fully covered by compensation insurance, the award was made against the two insurance carriers.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to respondent, as we are required to do in a proceeding of this nature, it appears that Dinwiddie Construction Company held a general contract to perform certain work for a cement company in Davenport in Santa Cruz…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kane v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bauer v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Dorsey v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API