Legal Opinion

In Re Keller

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1975No. Crim. 14033PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

This petition for writ of habeas corpus arises out of a finding that Theodore Keller was guilty of contempt of court and his sentence pursuant thereto. This court originally denied Keller’s petition for habeas corpus. Thereafter, the Supreme Court ordered respondent Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco to show cause before this court why the relief prayed for should not be granted, in light of Yates v. United States (1957) 355 U.S. 66 [2 L.Ed.2d 95, 78 S.Ct. 128],

Petitioner is a member of the faculty of San Francisco State University. On April 3, 1974, he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. HathcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. United States v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Furey v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Conn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. SulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API